Skip to content

[2021] | The Little Book On Oral Argument Pdf

This guide, inspired by Alan Dworsky's classic The Little Book on Oral Argument

"how."

Most legal writing focuses on the "what"—the citations, the briefing, the dense logic. Dworsky focuses on the He breaks down the terrifying 15 minutes at the podium into manageable, human beats. the little book on oral argument pdf

" by Alan L. Dworsky is rarely available for free due to copyright, you can find the official digital version on HeinOnline or borrow it through your law library's WorldCat listing. This guide, inspired by Alan Dworsky's classic The

HeinOnline

Law school libraries usually have a digital subscription to . Search for "Dworsky" or the full title. Many law libraries also have a dedicated study aid collection where the eBook is available for checkout. Develop a clear and concise opening statement :

Dworsky emphasizes that judges often dictate the flow of the argument as much as the lawyer does.

  1. Develop a clear and concise opening statement: Attorneys should begin by clearly stating their position, outlining the key issues, and setting the tone for the rest of the argument.
  2. Anticipate and respond to questions: Attorneys should prepare for common questions, think on their feet, and respond clearly and concisely to judicial inquiries.
  3. Use storytelling techniques: Attorneys can use narratives, examples, and anecdotes to make their arguments more engaging, relatable, and memorable.
  4. Show, don't tell: Rather than simply stating their position, attorneys should use evidence, data, and visuals to demonstrate their points and make a more compelling argument.

The bottom line:

Oral argument is won or lost in the first 90 seconds. This little book ensures those seconds are yours.

The book’s central theme is the psychology of persuasion through interaction. Dworsky emphasizes that in a real courtroom, judges—not lawyers—often control the flow of the session. They interrupt with questions, redirect focus, and even take up a lawyer's time to test a specific legal theory.